I am in the process of working my way through videos of the lectures associated with the “Passages” travelling exhibition of Green Collection. At the prompting of David Bradnick who is also engaging in this pastime, I jumped ahead to “Season 2,” the group of lectures given in Atlanta in 2012. David mentioned that Scott Carroll had interesting things to say about some Christian manuscripts and also the Green Collection Sappho Papyrus. It is the latter that will be the topic of this post.
Just to refresh: In February of 2014, an article in The Times announced that an anonymous owner “had material from an ancient Egyptian burial in his possession. He’d noticed that scraps of the cartonnage (the Egyptian equivalent of papier-mâché, made of recycled papyrus) bore the ghostly imprint of writing.” He contacted Oxford professor Dirk Obbink, who “prised the layers of shredded papyrus apart” and discovered a sizable fragment containing several lines of the Greek poet Sappho. Later, it became clear that the Green Collection also held additional fragments of the same papyrus roll of Sappho’s poems. Over time, however, the account of the origin of the Sappho papyrus changed quite dramatically. Here is the account of provenance given by Dirk Obbink in a 2016 publication [[my comments in italics inserted in double brackets]]:
“As reported and documented by the London owner of the Brothers and Kypris Song fragment, all of the fragments were recovered from a fragment of papyrus cartonnage formerly in the collection of David M. Robinson and subsequently bequeathed to the Library of the University of Mississippi [[As I have pointed out in a previous post, this is mistaken; the University of Mississippi never owned the Robinson Papyri]]. It was one of two pieces flat inside a sub-folder (sub-folder ‘e3’) inside a main folder (labelled ‘Papyri Fragments; Gk’.), one of 59 packets of papyri fragments sold at auction at Christie’s in London in November 2011. . . The layers of the cartonnage fragment, a thin flat compressed mass of papyrus fragments, were separated by the owner and his staff by dissolving in a warm-water solution. The owner originally believed that he had dissolved a piece of ‘mummy’ cartonnage. But this turned out upon closer inspection of the original papyri not to be the case: none of the fragments showed any trace of gesso or paint prior to dissolving or after. . . . The piece of cartonnage into which the main fragment containing the Brothers and Kypris Songs was enfolded (bottom to top, along still visible horizontal fold-lines, with the written side facing outwards) was probably domestic or industrial cartonnage: it might have been employed e.g. for a book-cover or book-binding. Some twenty smaller fragments removed from the exterior of this piece, being not easily identified or re-joined, were deemed insignificant and so traded independently on the London market by the owner, and made their way from the same source into the Green Collection in Oklahoma City.”
So, on this account it was not Dirk Obbink, but the anonymous London owner of the cartonnage who dissolved it and presented one large piece to Dirk Obbink to be published (as P.Sapph.Obbink). Other fragments of Sappho extracted from the cartonnage were sold by the owner (and extractor) of the papyri, and they eventually ended up in the Green Collection (P.GC inv. 105, frs. 1-4).
Now, let’s hear what Scott Carroll had to say about the Green Collection Sappho fragments back in 2012. After a “Passages” talk in Atlanta on the Dead Sea Scrolls given by Emanuel Tov, Scott Carroll gave some closing remarks, while holding up the Green Collection Sappho fragments as a prop:
“I do have an example here of what he’s talking about with Corn Flake-type–these are not quite Corn Flake size. You can see here. There are 26 fragments of this text in Greek on papyrus. And, um, it came out of a mummy mask I dismantled a few weeks ago. Um, it is, they are texts. Of course for me, with my area of passion and scholarship–biblical texts are, are what I’m most interested in. But really, truly for classical scholars, this is, these are texts of the most elusive and sought-after of all Greek authors, and that’s the writing of the, uh, female poet Sappho.”
So, according to Carroll’s version of events, he himself extracted the Green Collection’s Sappho fragments from a mummy mask. Now, several possibilities exist for reconciling these accounts:
- In his 2012 comments, Scott Carroll . . . misremembered that it was the anonymous London owner or Dirk Obbink who extracted the fragments that Carroll was holding in his hand.
- In the 2014 Times article, the author misstated who actually dismantled the cartonnage (the anonymous owner or Scott Carroll, rather than Dirk Obbink).
- In his 2016 publication, Dirk Obbink . . . misremembered that it was not the anonymous London owner but rather Scott Carroll or he himself who had extracted the Green Collection’s Sappho fragments from cartonnage.
- Scott Carroll was the anonymous London owner of P.Sapph.Obbink.
Number 2 would seem to be a distinct possibility in light of journalistic tendency to embellish stories. And in fact, David Meadows at rougeclassicism had already tentatively raised the possibility of number 4 based on other publicly available information (including Scott Carroll’s Facebook posts and Tweets) back in July of 2017. If it is in fact correct that Scott Carroll was the owner of P.Sapph.Obbink, two questions arise:
- Why would Dirk Obbink and Scott Carroll want to obscure that Carroll was the owner of the Sappho papyri?
- Is Scott Carroll still the owner of P.Sapph.Obbink?
And of course, questions about the ultimate origin of these papyri also remain unanswered: If these pieces are in fact “Robinson Papyri,” how did they come to be put up for auction in 2011? As best I can tell, the papyri were the property of Duke professor William Willis. He periodically donated pieces to Duke University but seems to have still owned several pieces at the time of his death. What became of them when he died? Can a path be traces from Willis to the 2011 auction?
Once again, some light could be shed on these matters if the Green Collection released information concerning from whom they purchased these papyri (or the cartonnage from which they were allegedly extracted).